
Google Analytics 360
By Google
A comprehensive analytics tool for large businesses and enterprises.

Matomo
By Matomo
An open-source analytics platform that provides insights into website usage and behavior.
Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Google Analytics 360 | Matomo |
|---|---|---|
| Data Retention | Up to 50 months | Unlimited |
| Data Sampling | No sampling | No sampling |
| Custom Dimensions | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Pricing | $150,000/year | Custom pricing |
| Integration | Wide range of integrations | Limited integrations |
| Security | High level of security | High level of security |
Overall Score Comparison
Feature Benchmark Ratings
Google Analytics 360 Analysis
Pros
- Advanced features and capabilities
- Wide range of integrations
- High level of security
Cons
- Expensive
- Steep learning curve
Matomo Analysis
Pros
- Affordable pricing options
- Open-source and community-driven
- High level of security
Cons
- Limited integrations
- Less advanced features
AI Verdict
Google Analytics 360 is the winner due to its advanced features, wide range of integrations, and high level of security, making it a better choice for large businesses and enterprises.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Google Analytics 360 and Matomo?
The main difference is the level of advanced features and capabilities, with Google Analytics 360 offering more.
Is Matomo free?
Matomo offers a free version, but it also has custom pricing options for larger businesses.
Can I use Google Analytics 360 for small businesses?
While Google Analytics 360 can be used for small businesses, it is typically more suited for large businesses and enterprises due to its advanced features and pricing.
Is Matomo open-source?
Yes, Matomo is an open-source analytics platform, which provides a high level of flexibility and customizability.
People Also Compare
Market Alternatives
Comparison Audit Summary
This dynamic audit side-by-side report for Google Analytics 360 vs Matomo has been automatically generated using our proprietary AI model. The ratings, features, and final verdict represent an aggregate evaluation across official documentation, technical benchmarks, and market feedback as of June 2026.